Letter: Revisiting Primary
0
Votes

Letter: Revisiting Primary

— To The Editor:

It has been most amusing to read the letters in this paper about the Democratic primary and the results. First several writers seem to have forgotten it was an open primary, not a carefully curated and vetted invitation only event, followed with a loyalty oath signed in blood. Second the mayor was soundly defeated in a three-way race. Many letters blame the Republicans for this result. This is a fascinating piece of critical thinking, given the overwhelming Republican presence in the city, especially on the council. Who knew there were so many in the city? Every voter, regardless of political view, had the same three choices. Why blame the Republicans? What about former Mayor Donley? He should feel insulted that he is not part of the discussion. Both Donley and Euille were better funded. Third is consensus. What some may view as consensus others may view as repression of dissent and free speech, which is part of democracy. This is the same thinking that changed the election calendar because Port City citizens had the unmitigated audacity to elect two Republicans to the City Council. Again some may be surprised to find out that dissent is not a crime. Fourth, some may be again surprised that many think the city is going in the wrong direction. As the city piles on debt it is apparent that our council is having a deep, long lasting love affair with “Rosie Scenario,” their real mistress. The recent election gave some recognition that the city’s current finances are unsustainable. Most economic development initiatives are under performing, costing more and producing less. Even the recent changes in parking meter hours are producing more problems for many businesses.

All of this helps explain the election results, not blaming the Republicans.

William L. Blumberg

Alexandria